If you’re a designer aiming to work in the U.S., the O-1 visa might be your golden ticket, but which type of O-1 you pursue can depend on the nature of your design work. The U.S. immigration law splits O-1 into two main categories: O-1A (for sciences, education, business, or athletics) and O-1B (for the arts, or for motion picture/TV industry achievements). Designers can fall into a gray area between art and science, so a UX designer might wonder: “Am I considered an artist or a business professional?” Similarly, an architect might ask: “Is my work viewed as technical or creative?” 

‍

This blog post will demystify how O-1A and O-1B differ for various design roles, from UX and product design to fashion, graphic, industrial, animation, interior design, and architecture, and how the visa pathway is decided based on your work and evidence.

‍

‍

UX Design: Creative Field at the Intersection of Art and Tech

In immigration terms, UX design is generally considered part of the “arts”. Immigration guidelines interpret “arts” broadly to include visual arts and design. O-1B is a viable path for many creative professionals, including “designers “(e.g.,Fashion, Graphic, UX/UI) Most UX designers therefore pursue O-1B as artists, emphasizing their creative contributions to app or web interfaces and the recognition they’ve earned for those.

How does a UX designer demonstrate “distinction” in their field? Often, through a strong portfolio of high-impact projects and industry recognition. For example, evidence might include:

• Leading roles in acclaimed projects: Perhaps you were the lead UX designer for a popular app or platform. If that product is well known, for example you designed critical interfaces for a top tier tech company or a widely used app, that can meet the O-1B criterion of being a lead or starring participant in an event which has a distinguished reputation. In addition, if you worked for a renowned company or led an important project as a contractor, that can qualify under the criterion of performing in a lead or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation. Letters from the company or media articles highlighting your contributions can further support this evidence.
  
  
• Press and awards: Honors like the Webby Awards (a prestigious award for internet and app design) are highly regarded; winning a Webby or being featured in something like the Apple Design Awards or Awwwards can serve as proof of national/international acclaim. Likewise, if tech publications or design blogs (e.g. UX Magazine, Smashing Magazine) have featured your work or interviews with you, that’s valuable evidence of recognition.
  
  
• Expert endorsements: Letters from industry experts or employers attesting that your UX work set you apart (perhaps citing metrics like improved user engagement due to your designs, or innovations you introduced) align with the O-1B criterion of significant recognition from organizations or experts. While UX is data-informed, the petition should highlight the creative and innovative aspects of your work, essentially showing you as a design thought leader whose ideas influence the field.

Could a UX designer ever go for O-1A instead? It’s uncommon, but not impossible.

If your profile is heavy on research and technical contributions (say you published academic papers on human-computer interaction, or invented patented UX technologies), you might make a case under “business or science.” You have to meet O-1A criteria like scholarly articles (maybe you have those), original contributions of major significance (e.g. a patented interface technology adopted widely), etc. In practice, most UX professionals qualify more naturally under O-1B because their accomplishments (design awards, creative leadership, media features) map directly to the arts criteria. It’s often simpler to show you’re a renowned designer than to prove you’re a top scientist in UX. The key is that USCIS expects evidence of creative acclaim, so a UX O-1B petition might include a sleek design portfolio, but it must be backed by third-party recognition (awards, press, expert praise) demonstrating your designs aren’t just good, they’re extraordinary.

And remember the practical angle: many UX designers do freelance or consulting on multiple projects. With an O-1B, you can use an agent petitioner to work with various clients, reflecting the gig nature of design work. This flexibility has made O-1B the go-to for UX/UI designers in practice.

‍

Product Design: Choosing Arts vs. Business for Multi-Faceted Designers

“Product design” is a broad term that can mean designing physical products (industrial design) or digital product strategy and UI (often overlapping with UX). The O-1 path for product designers can therefore diverge based on what aspect of design you emphasize. Many product designers are essentially doing industrial or interface design, which is inherently artistic since they create the look, feel, and function of new products. These individuals typically pursue O-1B (arts) like other designers, showcasing how their product designs have earned them acclaim. For instance, a product designer might highlight awards such as the Red Dot Award or iF Design Award (major international product design awards) as evidence of extraordinary ability. Being a winner or finalist in such competitions provides clear proof of standing out in the field. Likewise, media coverage of a product you designed (in design magazines or tech publications) helps meet the criterion about your achievements. Letters from companies or clients attesting that you played a critical role in creating a hit product can address the “leading/critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation” criterion. In essence, a classic product designer’s petition under O-1B will read much like a UX or industrial designer’s case – focused on creative excellence and recognition.

However, product design can also shade into product strategy and business innovation. Imagine a product designer whose work is more about high-level product strategy, growth, and user research; perhaps their contributions are documented in case studies or patents, rather than glossy design showcases. Such a person might frame themselves not as an “artist” but as a business professional with a design specialty. In fact, there have been cases where individuals in product design/strategy successfully went the O-1A route by highlighting the business impact of their work.

‍

Graphic Design: Visual Arts and the O-1B Artist Visa

Graphic designers are quintessential artists in the eyes of USCIS. Their field falls directly under “the arts,” and the O-1B is practically designed for them. Immigration law explicitly notes that the arts encompass a broad spectrum of creative fields, and recognized creative professionals such as graphic designers are prime candidates for the O-1B artist visa. Common pieces of a strong graphic design O-1B petition include:

• Design Awards and Exhibitions: Graphic design competitions and awards can carry a lot of weight. For example, honors like the AIGA Awards, the TDC (Type Directors Club) competitions, or international poster biennales are well-regarded in the field. Winning or even being shortlisted in a significant design competition can satisfy the criterion of a nationally or internationally recognized award or at least serve as evidence of “critical acclaim” in your field.
  
  Similarly, if your work has been exhibited in respected galleries or design shows, that can be framed as performing a leading role in events with distinguished reputations (for instance, having your poster series featured in a prestigious design biennial).
  
  
• Published Work in Books or Media: A feature article about you or your projects in a major design publication is solid gold evidence. It’s literally published material about the beneficiary in major media, a criterion under O-1. Even project-focused press (e.g., your branding project gets written up on a popular design blog or in AdWeek) helps demonstrate national/international recognition of your work.
  
  
• Clientele and Roles: Letters from notable clients or employers can help show you’ve played a critical or leading role for organizations with distinguished reputations. If the organizations themselves are prestigious, it strengthens the case that you operate at a high level.
  
  
• High Salary/Assignments: While not every graphic designer is highly paid early on, if you have evidence of commanding fees or salary substantially above peers (maybe you run a successful design studio with significant billings, or clients pay a premium for your services), that can cover the high remuneration criterion, underscoring that you’re sought-after due to your talent.

Since graphic design is unambiguously a creative field, there’s virtually no debate about O-1A vs O-1B here: it’s O-1B all the way, and the strategy is about marshaling all the artistic accolades you can. The type of evidence expected is very much creative industry evidence; you’re proving “extraordinary ability in the arts” as defined by USCIS, i.e., that you are prominent and well-known as a graphic artist.

‍

Fashion Design: Haute Couture and the Artist Visa

It’s no surprise that fashion designers are classic O-1B candidates; they are explicitly recognized among the creative professionals who often pursue the O-1 (sometimes even dubbed the “artist visa”). To satisfy USCIS that you have attained “distinction” in fashion, the evidence usually revolves around your achievements in the industry’s spotlight:

• Runway Shows & Collections: Have your designs been shown at prestigious fashion events like New York, Paris, or Milan Fashion Week? Participation in these top-tier events (especially if you headlined or had a solo show) can demonstrate you’ve performed a leading role in events with distinguished reputations. A letter from the organizers or media coverage of the show noting your collection was a highlight can substantiate that.
  
  
• Press and Magazines: Fashion is heavily covered by the press. If Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, Elle or other major fashion magazines have featured your designs or profiled you, those articles are prime evidence of national/international recognition. Even better, reviews by fashion critics praising your work count as critical reviews that O-1B criteria explicitly call out. Essentially, a thick stack of press clippings (or digital links) from well-known publications can tick the box for significant acclaim.
  
  
• Celebrity or High-Profile Clients: If A-list celebrities or public figures have worn your designs, that can be a form of recognition too. Letters from stylists or industry experts confirming your brand is sought-after at high levels can support the “recognition by experts” criterion.
  
  
• Awards and Honors: If you’ve been nominated for or won any notable award, that single-handedly can make a strong case (it fits the “awards” criterion perfectly). Even short of that, inclusion in prestigious programs (like being in a top fashion incubator or a finalist in design contests such as LVMH Prize) can be presented as evidence of distinction.
  
  
• Business Success (if Applicable): Some fashion designers might also show the commercial success of their line (e.g., sold-out collections, high sales figures) as part of “major commercial success”. If relevant, documentation like sales data or orders from luxury retailers could address the criterion of commercial success in the field. However, the glamour metrics (runways, press, celebrity clientele) carry more weight to demonstrate artistic acclaim.
  
  

It’s worth noting that USCIS holds motion picture/TV industry applicants to an even higher “extraordinary achievement” standard, but fashion designers are not in that category unless they are costume designers specifically working in film/TV. Most fashion designers fall squarely in the general “arts” realm, where the standard is “distinction,” which is demanding but attainable by showing you’re a trendsetter or leading light in fashion.

Industrial Design: Art in Everyday Products – Which Path to Choose?

This field is a blend of artistic design and practical engineering, which sometimes raises the question: should an industrial designer file under O-1B (arts) or could they be O-1A (science/business)? The answer often lies in how you present your work, but in most cases industrial design is treated as a creative profession, aligning with O-1B. For an industrial designer, a strong O-1B case will look much like that of other designers, focusing on creative excellence and recognition:

• Major Design Awards: The industrial design field has prestigious awards such as the Red Dot, iF Design Award, IDEA Awards (International Design Excellence Awards), and others. Winning one of these is a huge credibility boost. A Red Dot Award, for example, is internationally recognized evidence that such an award fits the O-1 criteria (internationally recognized prize for excellence) clearly.
  
  
• Patents and Innovations: Patents can serve as evidence in either category, as original contributions of major significance for O-1A, or as part of demonstrating the impact and recognition of your designs for O-1B (especially if the patented design was widely commercialized). If you have multiple patents on groundbreaking designs, one strategy could be to highlight them under O-1A’s “original contributions” criterion while still framing the overall petition as arts-focused.
  
  
• Press Coverage & Exhibitions: Like other designers, industrial designers benefit from media exposure. If design blogs, tech magazines, or industry journals have featured your work, for example, a new gadget you designed gets profiled in Wired or Core77, that’s great evidence of recognition. Additionally, industrial design often crosses into gallery exhibitions, especially for innovative or sustainable designs. Participating in a well-known exhibit like the Cooper Hewitt Design Triennial or Salone del Mobile’s design showcase could count as a distinguished event where you played a key role.
  
  
• Critical Roles for Companies: Letters from employers/clients can solidify how indispensable your talent is. Perhaps you were the design lead at a renowned company (think a major tech firm, automotive company, or a famous design consultancy). If that company has a distinguished reputation, detailing your critical role there hits the criterion of serving in an essential capacity for an organization of distinguished reputation. Combine that with any success of the product (like high sales or awards the product won) to emphasize your extraordinary impact.
  
  

Could O-1A be an option for an industrial designer? It’s not common, but possible in particular scenarios. For instance, if your work leans very heavily into innovation and engineering, say you design medical devices or tech hardware, and you have academic publications or scientific accolades, you might make a case under O-1A’s science/business criteria. You’d then highlight things like patents (as mentioned), memberships in professional engineering/design associations (only if they’re exclusive), scholarly articles or lectures you’ve given, etc. However, many industrial designers lack the traditional scholarly resume that O-1A favors. Also, you might miss out on the easier-to-meet arts criteria like “critical reviews” (because scientific fields don’t really have that). For most, positioning oneself as an artist with a portfolio of celebrated designs is more straightforward.

Animation and Motion Design: Digital Artists on the Border of Arts and Entertainment

Animation designers and animators bring illustrations to life, working in media ranging from movies and TV to video games and online content. This field unquestionably falls under the “arts”, but there’s a nuance: if you’re in film or television animation, you might be held to the higher O-1B standard for motion pictures/TV, meaning USCIS expects “extraordinary achievement” (a notch above the usual arts “distinction”). Don’t let that intimidate you, though. The fundamental approach for an animator or animation director’s visa is still via O-1B, emphasizing creative acclaim, with an eye to whether your work is considered part of the film industry or not.

For animators not in the Hollywood system, for example, a motion graphics designer for advertising, a game animator, or an independent animation artist, the standard O-1B arts criteria apply. You’d gather evidence like:

• Festival Awards and Screenings: Animation artists often gain recognition through film festivals (like Annecy for animation, or Sundance, etc. for short films) or competitions. If your animated short won “Best Animated Film” at a known festival, that’s a strong award to highlight (satisfies the major award criterion if big enough, or at least shows critical acclaim). Even being selected for screening at prestigious festivals or touring exhibits can be evidence of distinction.
  
  
• Critical Acclaim & Media: Reviews of your animated works in industry publications (e.g., Animation Magazine, Variety if it’s a film, or major animation blogs) count as published material about you. If a respected critic or outlet praised your work (“the animation style of X’s film is groundbreaking…”), include those clippings. Also, any interviews or profiles of you in the media bolster the idea that you’re a recognized talent.
  
  
• Notable Projects and Roles: Maybe you were a lead animator or art director on a well-known project. Letters from the production company or creative director can establish that you had a leading or critical role in a distinguished production. And if that project itself got accolades (say it won an award or had significant success), tie that in to show the impact of your contribution.
  
  
• Industry Recognition: Similar to other fields, letters from recognized experts (famous animation directors, producers, or scholars) attesting to your exceptional skills can satisfy the recognition from experts/peers criterion. Animators can also be members of professional organizations (like ASIFA – Association Internationale du Film d’Animation); while general membership may not mean much, if you held any position or received any honor from such groups, it could be relevant. High salary might be demonstrated if you’ve contracted on big studio projects at top rates, but often creatives lean more on qualitative acclaim than raw earnings.
  
  

Now, if you are an animator squarely in the motion picture/TV industry, say you’re a lead animator at Pixar or worked on major VFX for Hollywood films USCIS technically views you under the O-1B “MPTV” (Motion Picture/Television) subcategory, which demands “a very high level of accomplishment… such that you are recognized as outstanding, notable or leading” in that industry. The evidence criteria are actually the same list as for arts, but officers scrutinize them more strictly, looking for truly top-tier achievements (since Hollywood has things like Oscars, Annie Awards for animation, etc.). In practice, this means if you claim to be extraordinary in film/TV animation, you’d better have some substantial credits and honors: for instance, maybe you won an Annie Award (the top animation award) or contributed to an Oscar-winning animated feature. Or you have multiple blockbuster film credits where you were a supervising animator, proven by name credits and maybe publications like The Hollywood Reporter mentioning your work. The updated USCIS policy now even counts high-end streaming productions as part of that film/TV bucket, so working on a hit Netflix animated series might also fall under the higher standard.

For many animators, especially those working freelance or outside the major studios, it might be advantageous to focus the petition on the “arts” side of animation (general O-1B) rather than the film/TV side. 

Interior Design: Showcasing Creativity in Shaping Spaces

Interior design is unequivocally a design art, and O-1 petitions for interior designers are typically filed under O-1B (arts). Like other design professionals, interior designers benefit from the broad definition of arts in immigration law, which covers visual and applied arts (design of environments certainly qualifies).

How does an interior designer prove “extraordinary ability”? Consider the hallmarks of success in the interior design industry:

• Design Awards and Honors: Prestigious awards such as the Interior Design Magazine “Best of Year” Awards, ASID Awards (American Society of Interior Designers), or other regional design excellence awards can strongly support your case. If you’ve won “Interior Designer of the Year” in any well-known forum, or your projects have won awards (e.g., a restaurant you designed won a hospitality design award), those count as significant recognition. Awards are concrete evidence that peers and critics consider your work exceptional.
  
  
• Media Features (Shelter Magazines and Blogs): The interior design world is heavily documented in shelter magazines (like Architectural Digest, Interior Design, Elle Decor) and popular design blogs. If your projects have been published or you’ve been profiled, for example, a glossy spread in Architectural Digest showcasing a home you designed, that is prime evidence. Such articles demonstrate national/international recognition through published material about you and your work.
  
  
• Notable Clients and Projects: Perhaps you’ve designed interiors for high-profile clients, celebrities, multinational hotels, luxury boutiques, etc. Letters from these clients or from notable firms you’ve worked for can underscore that you’ve played a leading role for organizations/individuals of distinguished reputation. Similarly, if a major hotel chain entrusted you with designing a marquee property, that indicates trust in your extraordinary talent.
  
  
• Exhibitions and Speaking Engagements: Participating in a renowned design showcase or being a keynote at a top design summit can be cited as evidence of your prominence. While the O-1B criteria don’t list “invited speaker” per se, it can fall under “comparable evidence” or serve as context in expert letters about your reputation. It shows that you’re regarded as an authority in interior design by your peers.
  
  

In sum, interior designers should lean into the O-1B arts category, assembling a case that looks a lot like an art portfolio review: lots of visuals of stunning spaces you created backed by third-party recognition. 

Architecture: The Art-Science Dilemma in O-1 Visas

Architects design buildings that are not only structural feats but also aesthetic statements. This dual nature means architects can sometimes qualify under O-1A (highlighting the technical/business side) or O-1B (highlighting the artistic side). 

So which is it? The truth is, many architects have historically applied under O-1A, perhaps due to the perception of architecture as a technical profession.

O-1B (Arts) for Architects: If your portfolio is filled with design accolades, perhaps you’ve won architecture awards, design competitions, or your buildings are featured in design media, then leaning into the “architect as artist” narrative is powerful. Here’s what evidence in an O-1B case for an architect might include:

• Major Awards & Competitions: The architecture world’s top honors (e.g., the Pritzker Prize, AIA awards, RIBA awards) are obviously homeruns if you have them. But even regional or niche awards count. Winning an international design competition for a building or an urban design competition is excellent proof of your talent being extraordinary. This satisfies the award criterion or at least shows significant peer recognition.
  
  
• Notable Projects & Critical Acclaim: If you’ve designed landmark projects, those can be the centerpiece of your evidence. Publications like Architectural Digest, Dezeen, ArchDaily or academic journals often review noteworthy buildings. Feature articles or critical reviews of a building you authored can be used to show national/international recognition.
  
  
• Exhibitions: Architects sometimes exhibit their work (or concepts) in venues like the Venice Architecture Biennale or MoMA. Participation in prestigious exhibitions is strong evidence of being a leading figure in design (comparable to an artist exhibiting in a top gallery). It implicitly checks the box of having a distinguished reputation in the field.
  
  
• Expert Testimonials: Letters from renowned architects or critics attesting to your creativity and influence are key. They can explicitly make the case that “architect X is not just an engineer but an artist in how they conceive space,” reinforcing that you merit the artist visa. Since O-1B allows comparable evidence, such letters can go a long way in translating somewhat technical achievements into artistic merit.
  
  
• Press and Publications: Much like interior designers, if your work has been published in architectural magazines or books (“Top 100 Architects” lists, project features, etc.), include those. They show you are well-known in the field. Even scholarly publications (if you authored any) can be slipped in as supporting evidence of your thought leadership, though those align more with O-1A criteria.
  
  

O-1A (Science/Business) for Architects: On the flip side, maybe you haven’t won design awards, but you’ve achieved distinction through other means, perhaps you’ve led massive commercial projects, written technical papers, or advanced the field of sustainable design through research. In this scenario, an O-1A might be considered. You’d emphasize evidence like:

• Leading critical projects for top firms: e.g., you were a senior architect at a world-renowned firm (Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, etc.) and led projects worth hundreds of millions. That can show you had a critical role for a distinguished organization.
  
  
• Publications and Memberships: If you published in engineering or architecture journals, or have presented at major conferences (American Institute of Architects conferences, etc.), those hit O-1A criteria of scholarly articles and original contributions.
  
  
• Professional Impact: Perhaps you developed a novel architectural technique or standard (e.g., pioneered a sustainability practice) that could be an original contribution of major significance in the field. Patents on architectural technology, or building systems you invented, also fit here.
  
  

Architects truly stand at a crossroads of art and science. USCIS allows you to pick the path that best showcases you as “extraordinary.” If your skyscraper’s silhouette is celebrated on magazine covers, go the O-1B artist route and flaunt that creative acclaim. If your genius lies in the innovative engineering hidden in the walls, you might present yourself as an extraordinary technical talent under O-1A. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer: the visa pathway is decided by the nature of your accomplishments and the narrative you craft.

‍

Every design field carries its own markers of success, and the O-1 visa asks you to frame those achievements in the right light. For some designers, acclaim comes through artistic distinction. For others, it lies in innovation and measurable impact. Choosing between O-1A and O-1B is less about the job title and more about how USCIS will view your story.

At Casium, we help designers make that choice with confidence. By reviewing your career highlights, identifying the strongest evidence, and structuring a clear narrative, we ensure your petition reflects the extraordinary ability you bring to the field. Whether you are a product strategist, a fashion visionary, or an architect shaping skylines, our role is to turn recognition into a compelling case for approval.

With the right guidance, your creativity and expertise can be presented exactly as USCIS expects, making your petition not just complete, but persuasive.

‍

‍